The $30K Custom Tool That Replaced $15K/Year SaaS
Real case study of custom development economics. Initial investment, ongoing maintenance costs, feature evolution, and 5-year comparison showing custom pays for itself in 24 months.
"We're spending $15,000 per year on a project management tool that doesn't quite fit our workflow. Should we build custom?" This is the question that leads to either smart economic decisions or expensive mistakes. Here's a real case study where building custom made financial sense, paid for itself in 24 months, and continues saving $10,000+ annually.
The Starting Situation
Company: 35-person consulting firm Industry: Management consulting Problem: Using Monday.com Pro for project and resource management Annual cost: $15,120 ($19/user × 30 users × 12 months + integrations)
What Wasn't Working
Workflow mismatches:
- Resource allocation across projects (Monday.com's strength is tasks, not resource management)
- Consultant availability tracking (workarounds with custom fields)
- Financial tracking integration (Zapier connecting to QuickBooks, fragile)
- Client portal access (Monday.com not designed for client visibility)
- Reporting on consultant utilization (difficult to get accurate data)
Cost concerns:
- Growing from 30 to 40 users would increase cost to $20,000+/year
- Integration costs (Zapier) adding $1,200/year
- Time spent on workarounds: ~10 hours/week across team
The Decision Point
Year 3 on Monday.com:
- Cumulative spent: ~$45,000
- Frustration level: High
- Growth trajectory: Adding 10-15 people over next 2 years
- Projected Year 5 cost: $25,000+/year
Question: Is custom development a better 5-year investment?
The Custom Development Project
Requirements Phase (3 weeks, $4,000)
What we needed:
- Project and task management
- Resource allocation and scheduling
- Consultant availability calendar
- Time tracking integration
- Financial tracking (budgets, actuals, forecasts)
- Client portal (view project status, not edit)
- Utilization reporting
- QuickBooks integration
What we documented:
- 15 user stories covering core workflows
- Data model for projects, tasks, resources, time
- Integration requirements (QuickBooks, Google Calendar)
- Reporting requirements
- Mobile requirements (view-only acceptable)
Design Phase (2 weeks, $3,000)
UI/UX design:
- Wireframes for all major screens
- User flow diagrams
- Design system (colors, typography, components)
- Mobile responsive layouts
Technical architecture:
- React frontend
- FastAPI backend
- PostgreSQL database
- Hosted on AWS
- QuickBooks OAuth integration
- Google Calendar sync
Development Phase (10 weeks, $18,000)
Sprint 1-2 (Core functionality):
- Project and task CRUD
- User authentication
- Basic resource allocation
- $6,000
Sprint 3-4 (Advanced features):
- Resource calendar view
- Availability tracking
- Time tracking interface
- $6,000
Sprint 5-6 (Integrations):
- QuickBooks integration
- Google Calendar sync
- Email notifications
- $6,000
Testing & Launch (2 weeks, $2,000)
- User acceptance testing
- Bug fixes
- Data migration from Monday.com
- Training documentation
- Go-live support
Total Development: $27,000
Timeline: 17 weeks (4 months)
Year 1: Implementation and Stabilization
One-Time Costs
- Development: $27,000
- AWS setup: $500
- Training time: $2,000 (internal labor)
- Total: $29,500
Ongoing Costs (8 months post-launch)
- AWS hosting: $150/month × 8 = $1,200
- Bug fixes and adjustments: $3,000
- Total ongoing Year 1: $4,200
Year 1 Total: $33,700
vs. Monday.com Year 1: $15,120 Year 1 difference: -$18,580 (custom costs more)
Year 2: Refinement and Growth
Costs
- AWS hosting: $150/month × 12 = $1,800
- Maintenance: $4,000
- New features (2 major additions): $5,000
- Year 2 Total: $10,800
Company Growth
- Grew from 35 to 45 people
- Custom: Same $10,800 (no per-user costs)
- Monday.com equivalent: $20,520 (45 users)
Year 2 difference: +$9,720 savings (custom cheaper)
Features Added
- Advanced utilization reporting
- Automated availability updates from Google Calendar
- Enhanced client portal with document sharing
Year 3: Optimization
Costs
- AWS hosting: $1,800
- Maintenance: $4,000
- Features: $3,000
- Year 3 Total: $8,800
Company Size
- Grew to 50 people
- Custom: $8,800
- Monday.com equivalent: $22,800 (50 users)
Year 3 difference: +$14,000 savings
Optimization Benefits
- Consultant utilization improved 15% (better visibility)
- Project profitability tracking enabled better pricing decisions
- Client satisfaction improved (portal transparency)
Year 4-5: Mature Product
Annual Costs (Each Year)
- AWS hosting: $1,800
- Maintenance: $4,000
- Minor enhancements: $2,000
- Annual: $7,800
Company Size (Year 5)
- 55 people
- Custom: $7,800
- Monday.com equivalent: $25,080
Year 4-5 difference: +$17,280 savings each year
5-Year Financial Analysis
Total Costs
Custom development:
- Year 1: $33,700
- Year 2: $10,800
- Year 3: $8,800
- Year 4: $7,800
- Year 5: $7,800
- 5-Year Total: $68,900
Monday.com (projected growth):
- Year 1: $15,120 (30 users)
- Year 2: $20,520 (45 users)
- Year 3: $22,800 (50 users)
- Year 4: $25,080 (55 users)
- Year 5: $25,080 (55 users)
- 5-Year Total: $108,600
Savings: $39,700 over 5 years (37% reduction)
Break-Even Analysis
Cumulative costs:
- Year 1: Custom $33,700 vs. SaaS $15,120 (custom -$18,580)
- Year 2: Custom $44,500 vs. SaaS $35,640 (custom -$8,860)
- Year 3: Custom $53,300 vs. SaaS $58,440 (custom +$5,140)
Break-even: 26 months (mid-Year 3)
The Intangible Benefits
Beyond dollar savings, custom delivered value SaaS couldn't:
Perfect Workflow Fit
Before (Monday.com):
- 5-10 workaround steps per common task
- Data in multiple places (Monday, spreadsheets, QuickBooks)
- Clunky resource allocation
- Poor utilization visibility
After (Custom):
- Direct workflow support
- Single source of truth
- Intuitive resource calendar
- Real-time utilization dashboards
Time savings: ~8 hours/week across team Value: ~$40,000/year in productivity
Client Experience Improvement
Custom portal allowed:
- Real-time project status
- Document access
- Communication history
- Transparent billing
Impact:
- Client satisfaction improved (measured in surveys)
- Reduced client check-in calls
- Stronger client relationships
Business Intelligence
Custom reporting enabled:
- Consultant utilization by client, project, skill
- Project profitability in real-time
- Resource forecasting
- Pricing optimization data
Impact:
- 15% improvement in utilization
- Better project pricing decisions
- Capacity planning accuracy
Conservative value: $50,000+/year in better resource allocation
What Made This Successful
1. Clear Requirements
Spent 3 weeks documenting exactly what was needed. No scope creep because requirements were thorough.
2. Phased Development
Built core first, advanced features later. Could have launched after Sprint 4 if needed.
3. Realistic Timeline
17 weeks actual vs. 16 weeks estimated. Padding and good project management avoided delays.
4. Experienced Team
Hired agency with track record. Cost more upfront but avoided rookie mistakes and delays.
5. Data Migration Plan
Carefully migrated from Monday.com with 2-week parallel operation. Smooth transition.
6. User Involvement
Weekly demos to stakeholders. Feedback incorporated during development, not after.
7. Maintenance Budget
Planned for ongoing costs. Not shocked by Year 2 maintenance needs.
Common Questions
"What if requirements change?"
They did. Year 2-3 added features not in original spec. Cost $8,000 total. Still way ahead of Monday.com costs.
"What if developer relationship sours?"
Risk mitigation:
- Source code owned by company
- Documented codebase
- Not locked to single developer
- Could hire different team if needed
"What about hosting reliability?"
AWS uptime: 99.9%+ (same as most SaaS) Cost: $150/month vs. included in SaaS Control: Full control over infrastructure and data
"What if the company didn't grow?"
Scenario: Stayed at 35 people
Monday.com: $15,120/year × 5 = $75,600 Custom: $68,900 (as calculated)
Still saved: $6,700 (9% savings)
Break-even: 48 months instead of 26 months
Conclusion: Growth accelerated ROI but wasn't required for positive economics.
Lessons for Others Considering Custom
Good Candidates for Custom
Annual SaaS cost $12,000+ Growing user base (multiplies SaaS costs) Poor workflow fit (spending time on workarounds) 3-5 year time horizon Clear, stable requirements Can afford $25,000-50,000 upfront investment
Poor Candidates for Custom
Annual SaaS under $5,000 (not worth custom effort) Shrinking or stable small team SaaS fits workflow well (why rebuild what works?) Short time horizon (1-2 years) Rapidly changing requirements Can't afford upfront investment
Key Success Factors
- Thorough requirements (prevents scope creep)
- Experienced development partner (avoids delays and cost overruns)
- Realistic timeline (plan for 15-20 weeks minimum)
- Budget for ongoing (maintenance isn't free)
- Clear ownership (someone accountable for the tool)
- User involvement (feedback during development, not after)
The Thalamus Custom Development Approach
How we ensure success:
Discovery Phase ($3,000-5,000)
- Requirements documentation
- Workflow analysis
- Data migration planning
- Risk assessment
- Fixed-price quote for development
Development ($25,000-100,000 depending on complexity)
- Phased delivery
- Weekly stakeholder demos
- Change request process
- Testing and QA
- Launch support
Ongoing Support ($500-2,000/month)
- Hosting and infrastructure
- Bug fixes and maintenance
- Feature enhancements
- User support
Success rate: 90%+ projects deliver on time and budget
Why: Thorough discovery, experienced team, realistic expectations
The Bottom Line
This case study shows custom can win economically when:
- SaaS costs $12,000+/year
- Company growing (user-based pricing hurts)
- Workflow mismatch with SaaS (time wasted)
- 3-5 year time horizon
- Initial investment affordable ($25,000-50,000)
Results for this company:
- $39,700 saved over 5 years (37% reduction)
- Break-even at 26 months
- Better workflow fit (worth $40,000+/year in productivity)
- Ongoing savings $15,000+/year after break-even
Not every company should build custom. But if you match this profile, the economics often favor custom over continuing to pay high SaaS costs for imperfect fit.
About Thalamus: We build custom business applications for companies spending $10,000+/year on SaaS tools that don't quite fit. Typical 18-36 month payback, ongoing savings of 30-60%. Discovery phase: Contact us